Abstract
The current research examined the observed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great christianmingle log in interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) just how do the participants feel it impacts upon them? And finally, (3) Just how can the participants predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college students with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that almost all the individuals had been impacted by the social stress placed upon them. More over, the individuals identified the generation that is previous “racist”. But, interestingly you can find signs and symptoms of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings show that more than 80 percent for the individuals failed to would you like to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 per cent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.
That is a preview of membership content, access via your organization.
Access choices
Purchase solitary article
Access immediately to your article PDF that is full.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Donate to journal
Immediate on the web access to all the presssing dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Records
It ought to be noted that dating is generally speaking maybe not appropriate into the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention is always to date solely (nevertheless, particular limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the try to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval regarding the female’s dad ( or other significant male figure) is had a need to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the assortment of the information in purchase to respect individuals’ social traditions and observing that is religious.
Sources
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, plus the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test of this contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating Jewish females. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Ny, NY: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and household connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex together with context that is cultural of and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence system participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Relationship in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Nyc: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features with all the passage through of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of competition for initiating a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the variety of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a tiny university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies while the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites plus the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social help determinants of relationship dedication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of internet sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens associated with network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: the creative art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. Nyc: The Complimentary Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, only a few love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.